Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS) — DPIIT Guidelines

₹20 Crore
Maximum Guarantee Cover Per Borrower
85% / 75%
Of Default — Loans Up To ₹10 Crore / Above ₹10 Crore
1% – 2%
Annual Guarantee Fee, By Borrower Category
12 Months
Lock-in Before The Guarantee Can Be Invoked
Share:

Video Explanation & Insights

Overview

What CGSS Is, and Who Actually Holds the Guarantee

Source: This page decodes Gazette Notification S.O. 2046(E) dated 08 May 2025, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii), by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Startup India Section), signed by the Joint Secretary. Every rate, ceiling, timeline and condition below is drawn strictly from that notification, with the clause reference shown. The notification records its own effect at the outset: it supersedes the earlier CGSS gazette notification S.O. 4741(E) dated 06 October 2022 and comes into force from the date of the 2025 notification. Under clause 1(iii), loan or debt facilities sanctioned to an eligible borrower on or after the date of notification of the scheme are eligible for coverage.
Live scheme (as at 25 July 2026) — and the May 2025 revision materially improved the terms. CGSS is operational, with NCGTC as the implementing agency and no sunset date in the notification — unlike a window-based scheme, it runs against a fixed corpus rather than a calendar. The 2025 revision, flowing from a Union Budget 2025-26 announcement, made three changes worth knowing when comparing against any older note or bank circular still in circulation: the ceiling per borrower doubled from ₹10 crore to ₹20 crore; the extent of cover was raised to 85% of the amount in default for loans up to ₹10 crore and 75% above that; and the Annual Guarantee Fee for the 27 Champion Sectors was cut from 2% to 1% per annum. Any advisory prepared against the 2022 notification is now wrong on all three. Confirm the operative version and current product terms with the lending institution and on ncgtc.in before filing.

Clause 2 states the objective plainly: to provide guarantee up to a specified limit against credit instruments extended by Member Institutions to finance eligible startups, so as to provide the much-needed collateral-free debt funding to startups. The guarantee is issued by the Credit Guarantee Fund for Startups (CGFS), a trust managed by the Board of NCGTC — the National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company Limited, set up by the Government on 28 March 2014 under the Companies Act 1956 to act as trustee for the Government's various credit guarantee funds (clauses 3-i, 3-ii).

What Can Be Guaranteed

Clause 10 lists the instruments: venture debt, working capital, subordinated debt / mezzanine debt, debentures, optionally convertible debt, and other fund-based as well as non-fund-based facilities which have crystallised as a debt obligation. Pure equity is outside the scheme — the cover attaches to debt.

What Happens When Optionally Convertible Debt Converts

On conversion of optionally convertible debt to equity, partially or fully, the borrower's debt obligation and the guarantee both stand reduced to the extent of the conversion. The MI must take prior permission from the Fund or Trustee, which may be given conditionally or at a pre-closure premium, or the conversion may be treated as a cash inflow at final settlement of claims (clause 10-ii).

The 100%-style comfort does not exist here, and the borrower's liability is untouched either way. Two points that clients consistently get wrong. First, this is not a full guarantee: the cover is 85% or 75% of the amount in default, so the lender retains real skin in the game and will underwrite accordingly — clause 7(i) requires the MI to apply prudent banking judgement and its own business discretion in selecting commercially viable proposals. A guarantee-backed application is still a credit application. Second, clause 7(v) mirrors the standard position across NCGTC schemes: payment of the guarantee claim does not in any way take away the MI's responsibility to recover the entire outstanding amount from the borrower, and the MI must maintain full recourse. Founders who treat CGSS-backed venture debt as soft money because “the government guarantees it” should be corrected at term-sheet stage.
Eligibility

Three Tests for the Startup; a Rating and Net-worth Bar for the Lender

The Borrower (clause 4)

TestRequirement
RecognitionA startup recognised by DPIIT as per the gazette notifications issued from time to time.
StandingNot in default to any lending or investing institution, and not classified as an NPA per RBI guidelines.
CertificationEligibility must be certified by the Member Institution for the purpose of guarantee cover.

The Lender (clause 5)

  • Scheduled Commercial Banks and Financial Institutions.
  • RBI-registered NBFCs with a rating of BBB or above from an RBI-accredited external credit rating agency, and a minimum net worth of ₹100 crore. If an NBFC is later downgraded below BBB, it becomes ineligible for further guarantee cover until it is upgraded back.
  • SEBI-registered Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs).
A revenue-stage test that was in the 2022 notification does not appear in the 2025 text. The superseded 06.10.2022 notification carried a fourth borrower condition — that the startup had reached a stage of stable revenue stream, assessed from audited monthly statements over a 12-month period, amenable to debt financing. The 8 May 2025 notification lists three criteria at clause 4, and that condition is not among them. This appears to widen the eligible pool to earlier-stage startups. Two cautions before relying on it: some bank product pages still reproduce the stable-revenue condition in their own CGSS eligibility notes, and an MI is in any case free to impose stricter internal credit norms than the scheme requires. So the gazette position and the counter position may differ — establish the specific MI's current norm rather than arguing the gazette at the branch.
Member Institutions layer their own conditions, and those are where deals actually die. The scheme sets the floor; the lender sets the bar. Published bank product notes for CGSS carry restrictions found nowhere in the gazette — excluding real estate projects, excluding HUFs, and in at least one case requiring an existing guaranteed facility under another government scheme to be closed before CGSS can be availed. None of these are scheme conditions and none of them are uniform across MIs, which means the same startup can be eligible at one lender and ineligible at another on identical facts. Read the target MI's own CGSS product note alongside the gazette before advising on eligibility, and treat lender selection as part of the structuring work.
Guarantee Formats

Two Guarantee Formats — Transaction vs Umbrella

Clause 9 splits the scheme in two. Transaction-based cover is taken by a lending institution on a single eligible borrower. Umbrella-based cover is taken by an investing institution for a group of eligible borrowers, and is built around a Venture Debt Fund — a debt fund registered under SEBI's AIF regulations — and its Pooled Investment in Startups (PIS), meaning cumulative investments in DPIIT-recognised startups over the life of the fund (clauses 3-vii, 3-viii, 3-xii, 3-xiii).

ParameterTransaction-basedUmbrella-based
Who takes itBanks, FIs, eligible NBFCs. AIFs are expressly not eligible for transaction-based cover (9-ii).Venture Debt Funds under SEBI AIF regulations.
BasisSingle eligible borrower.Pooled Investment in Startups across the fund's portfolio.
Cover commencesFrom the date of payment of guarantee fee; runs through the agreed tenure of the loan or debt facility (9-iii).From the date of payment of commitment charges; runs through the life of the VDF, provided borrowers remain eligible and charges are paid annually from the first year of operations to closure (9-iv, 12).
Extent of cover85% of amount in default for loans up to ₹10 crore; 75% above ₹10 crore (12).Actual losses, or a maximum of 5% of the Pooled Investment on which cover is taken, whichever is lower (12).
Per-borrower ceiling₹20 crore — applies to both formats (11-i, 12).₹20 crore — applies to both formats (11-i, 12).
Claim payout75% within 60 days, balance 25% later (13-vi-c).100% within 60 days as full and final claim (13-v-f).

How Losses Are Computed Under the Umbrella Format

Losses are defined as the aggregate of principal investments of written-off assets together with three months' accrued interest from the date of default. Where an asset is partially written off, only the principal portion written off, plus three months' accrued interest on it from the date of default, is counted (clause 12).

The 5% cap is the defining constraint of the umbrella product. A venture debt fund does not get loss cover on each investment — it gets the lower of actual losses or 5% of the pooled investment covered. On a ₹500 crore pool, that is ₹25 crore of aggregate protection regardless of how the individual positions perform, still subject to ₹20 crore per borrower. This is portfolio-level first-loss protection, not per-deal insurance, and it should be modelled as a thin credit enhancement on the fund's expected loss curve rather than as downside cover on any single position. It also explains the pricing asymmetry in Section 4: the umbrella commitment charge is 0.15% against a transaction fee of 2% — the fund is buying much less protection per rupee of exposure.
Fee Structure

Who Pays, How Much, and the Clause That Voids the Cover

Transaction-based — Annual Guarantee Fee (clause 8)

Borrower categoryAnnual Guarantee Fee
Standard2% p.a.
Units from the North East region, and units of women entrepreneurs1.5% p.a.
Units from the 27 Champion Sectors1% p.a.

The fee is charged on the disbursement or outstanding amount — on the sanction amount in the case of working capital and non-fund based facilities — as on the date of application for guarantee cover, and is paid upfront within 30 days of the Credit Guarantee Demand Advice Note (CGDAN). Subsequent AGFs are computed on the outstanding at the beginning of the financial year, plus additional disbursements during the year on a pro-rata basis. The guarantee start date is the date the fee is credited to the Trust's bank account. Renewal fee is due within 30 days, i.e. on or before 30 April, each year (8-i to 8-vi).

Umbrella-based — Annual Commitment Charge (clause 8)

  • ACC of 0.15% p.a. of the proposed Pooled Investment in Startups, upfront within 30 days of the CGDAN. If the actual pooled investment exceeds what was proposed, the balance charge is payable.
  • One-time guarantee fee of 1% of the Pooled Investment, payable at the time of invocation of the guarantee claim or admission of the claim file.
  • If no claim is made: a guarantee closure charge of 0.25% of the Pooled Investment, within 30 days of the date of closure of the VDF.
  • ACC is computed for full years across the life of the VDF, including the first and last years, irrespective of the actual dates of commencement and closure — no pro-rata is envisaged for those years. ACCs remitted are non-refundable.
  • Delay beyond the stipulated period attracts penal charges of 4% above the prevailing Repo Rate until final payment.
Non-payment of the fee does not merely delay the cover — it extinguishes it. Clauses 8(vii) and 8(vi) of the umbrella limb are unusually blunt: if the AGF or ACC is not paid within the stipulated or extended time, the liability of the Trust to guarantee that credit facility lapses in respect of the facility against which the fee is due and unpaid. There is no grace, no reinstatement mechanism, and for the umbrella format the cover simply does not start until any shortfall in commitment charges is made good. The operational consequence is that the 30 April renewal date is not an administrative deadline — it is the date on which an entire year's guarantee protection either continues or vanishes. For an MI with a portfolio of covered accounts, this belongs on a monitored compliance calendar, not in an accounts-payable queue.
The certificate that accompanies every application and renewal. Clause 8(ix) requires the MI to furnish a Statutory Auditor Certificate or Management Certificate, as prescribed by the Trust, with every new application and with every continuity or updation file at renewal, certifying three things: that the accounts for which guarantee is taken conform to eligible loans sanctioned after the CGSS notification date; that debt facilities were sanctioned after proper due diligence and sanction by the Investment Committee of the VDF; and that the borrower's activity for which the facility was granted has not ceased. That third limb is a live, recurring representation about the startup's continuing operations — and it is a professional certification exposure worth scoping carefully before it is signed.
Extent & Ceilings

Three Separate Caps, and Only One of Them Is the Headline Number

CapRule
Per borrower (11-i)Maximum guarantee cover shall not exceed ₹20 crore per borrower — applies across both formats.
Slab on extent (12)85% of the amount in default for loan amount up to ₹10 crore; 75% for loan amount exceeding ₹10 crore.
Annual cap per MI (13-v)Maximum guarantee amount payable to an MI on accounts guaranteed under the scheme during a year is capped at 20% of the total sanctions during that year (where at least 90% of the amount has been disbursed).
No double cover (11-ii)The credit facility being covered should not have been covered under any other guarantee scheme.
Partial collateral (11-iii)Where part of a facility is secured by partial collateral security, only the remaining unsecured portion is covered. The guarantee is limited to the outstanding limit less the value of collateral accepted by the MI at sanction per its valuation policy.
Shared cover (18-iii-g)Where a single startup is covered by multiple MIs, the guarantee cover is shared in proportion to their outstanding debt. Future venture debt lenders are eligible only for the balance cover available. All MIs must disclose, when seeking cover, the details of other MIs and the venture debt the startup has taken from them.
The 20%-of-annual-sanctions cap is the one nobody reads, and it is a portfolio-level cap on the lender. Clause 13(v) limits the total guarantee amount payable to an MI in a year to 20% of that MI's total sanctions during the year. This is not a per-borrower rule — it is aggregate exposure management by the Trust, and it means an MI facing a cluster of defaults in a single year may find its claims capped well below the sum of the individual guarantees it holds. For a startup borrower, the practical read-through is that the cover behind its facility is less absolute than the 85% headline suggests, and a lender's willingness to keep lending under CGSS can tighten sharply after a bad year in its startup book. The shared-cover rule at 18(iii)(g) compounds this: a startup that has already drawn venture debt from one MI has correspondingly less guarantee capacity left for the next lender, which is a real constraint when raising a second debt round and should be disclosed early in those conversations.
Invocation & Claims

Twelve Months Locked, Then a Hard Window to Invoke

  1. 1Cover commences — and the lock-in starts: Guarantee cover begins on the date the fee reaches the Trust's account. A lock-in period of 12 months from the date of commencement of guarantee cover applies, during which no invocation can be made (3-ix, 13-ii, 13-iv).
  2. 2The account turns NPA: The guarantee must have been in force at the time the account turned NPA (13-i), the amount due must be unpaid, and the dues classified as NPA by the MI (13-iii). No claim lies if the loss arose from actions or decisions contrary to, or in contravention of, the Trust's guidelines.
  3. 3Recall and initiate recovery — before lodging: Prior to lodging, the MI must ensure the facility has been recalled and recovery proceedings initiated under due process of law — via IBC (requiring admission of notice and appointment of an IRP), SARFAESI (action under Section 13(4), taking recourse to one or more of the four measures), DRT (application lodged), or another process the Trustee considers suitable. For umbrella cover, arbitration is also listed (13-vi-a, 13-v-a).
  4. 4The invocation window: The MI may invoke within a maximum of 12 months from the date of NPA where the NPA falls after the lock-in; or within two years of the lock-in where the NPA falls within the lock-in period (13-vi).
  5. 5Settlement — 75% within 60 days: For transaction-based cover, the Trust pays 75% of the guaranteed amount within 60 days of an eligible claim, subject to it being in order and complete. Delay beyond 30 days carries interest to the MI at the prevailing Repo Rate. For umbrella cover, the Trust pays 100% within 60 days as full and final claim (13-vi-c, 13-v-f).
  6. 6The balance 25%, and discharge: The remaining 25% is paid on conclusion of recovery proceedings by the MI, or on write-off of the borrower's unpaid dues. On a claim being paid, the Trust is deemed discharged from all its liabilities on the guarantee in respect of that borrower (13-vi-c).

One Time Settlement

An OTS is permitted to an MI only after one year of the account turning NPA, and at a haircut of 20% below the existing guarantee cover (clause 13-vii).

Two dates decide whether a claim survives, and both are easy to miss. The 12-month lock-in runs from commencement of cover, not from disbursement — and cover commences only when the fee is credited, so a delay in paying the AGF pushes the lock-in expiry later than the facility date would suggest. At the other end, the 12-month invocation window from the NPA date is a hard stop, and it cannot begin to be met until recall and formal recovery action are already under way. Since IBC admission or SARFAESI 13(4) action takes time to achieve, the practical sequence is that recovery proceedings must start well inside the twelve months, not at the end of it. For an MI, the file discipline is to diarise the NPA date and the recovery-initiation milestone together, because the claim is only lodgeable once both the recall and the qualifying legal action are complete.
Recoveries & Subrogation

The Trust Does Not Chase the Borrower — The Lender Does, on the Trust's Behalf

  • No subrogation. The Trust shall not exercise any subrogation rights. Recovery of dues, including takeover and sale of assets, rests entirely with the MI, which holds lien on assets created out of the facility on its own behalf and on behalf of the Trust (14-i).
  • Quarterly remittance. Every amount recovered in a financial quarter and due to the Trust must be paid within 30 days of the end of that quarter. Delay beyond 30 days from the stipulated date carries interest to the Trust at 4% above the prevailing Repo Rate for the period outstanding (14-ii).
  • Three-year tail. Remittance of post-claim recoveries by the MI to the guarantor is restricted to a maximum of 3 years after settlement of the final claim, after which the account is closed in the books of the Trust (14-iii).
  • Deemed appropriation. Where a borrower owes several distinct and separate debts to the MI and pays towards any one or more of them, such payments are deemed to have been appropriated to the guaranteed debt in respect of which a claim has been preferred and paid — irrespective of the manner of appropriation indicated by the borrower or of how the MI actually applied them (14-iv).
  • Upside netting (umbrella). Any upside earnings from equity-linked instruments are netted out of the settlement amount, or refunded to the Trust as and when booked by the MI (13-v-g).
  • Claw-back with penal interest. The MI must refund the claim with penal interest at 4% p.a. over the Repo Rate where the Trust recalls it on account of deficiencies in appraisal, renewal, follow-up or conduct of the loan, where the claim was lodged more than once, or where the MI suppressed material information at settlement. Penal interest runs from the date of initial release to the date of refund (13-v-h).
Clause 14(iv) quietly displaces the borrower's right to direct its payments. Under general law a debtor may say which debt a payment discharges. Here, once a claim has been preferred and paid on the guaranteed account, any payment the startup makes towards any facility with that MI is deemed to reduce the guaranteed debt, whatever the founder instructed and whatever the bank actually did with it. For a startup running a working capital line and a venture debt facility with the same institution, selective servicing will not produce the outcome the founder intends. The advisory point is preventive rather than curative: if the CGSS-covered facility is the one heading towards stress, the appropriation rule removes the flexibility a promoter may be assuming they have, and that should shape the restructuring conversation before default, not after.
Governance

Two Committees Above the Trust, and a Penalty That Scales With a Lender's NPAs

Management Committee (clause 15)

Constituted by DPIIT to oversee the Trust's affairs and provide policy guidance. It is fully empowered to revise the types of guarantee products, extent of coverage, eligible instruments, coverage amount and loss calculation, guarantee fee, claim settlement and invocation, leverage ratio limits, any other thematic parameter, and MI eligibility. Composition: Secretary, DPIIT (Chairperson); AS & Financial Advisor, DPIIT; AS / JS (Startups), DPIIT; Joint Secretary, Department of Financial Services; and the CEO of NCGTC as Member Secretary, plus ecosystem experts nominated by the Secretary, DPIIT. The MC may also remove or add MIs from the list on review of performance, and may prescribe additional criteria such as AUM, track record and capital adequacy.

Risk Evaluation Committee (clause 16)

Also constituted by DPIIT, reporting to the MC, and holding an arm's-length relationship with the Trustee to address conflict of interest. Members are drawn from rating agencies, retired bankers, venture debt specialists and credit guarantee experts.

The NPA-linked Risk Premium on MIs (clause 18-i)

For transaction-based guarantees, the MI must submit a Management Certificate as at 31 March each year, showing cumulative outstanding and outstanding NPAs under its startup assistance scheme, within 3 months of the close of the financial year. Failing that, no guarantee cover is extended for fresh accounts. Where outstanding NPAs as a ratio of outstanding under the scheme exceed the thresholds below, an additional risk premium applies prospectively on future guarantee covers:

MI's outstanding NPA ratio under the schemeAdditional risk premium on future covers
Exceeds 10%0.25% p.a.
Exceeds 15%0.5% p.a.
Over 20%0.75% p.a.

Other Monitoring and Reporting

  • A surveillance mechanism for investments into Venture Debt Funds from countries sharing a land border with India, and an early-stage evaluation mechanism to ensure the scheme's targets are met (clause 17).
  • Under umbrella cover, the VDF submits portfolio performance updates quarterly (19-iv).
  • The Trust or Trustee may inspect or call for copies of the books of account and records of the MI and of any borrower, through its own officers or an appointed person; every officer or employee of the MI or the borrower in a position to do so must make those records available (19-iii).
  • Umbrella cover carries entry conditions of its own: the VDF must be in fund-raising stage with Final Close not declared, its investment period not expired, and no NPAs (accounts over 90 days in default) in the existing portfolio — such accounts are kept out of the guaranteed portfolio. Cover is restricted to investments in startups; losses on non-startup investments are not claimable. If the corpus is enhanced through a green shoe option, charges are recomputed on the enhanced corpus from the date of exercise (18-iii).
Where the professional work concentrates on a CGSS file. On the startup side: confirming DPIIT recognition is current, establishing the no-default and no-NPA position across all lenders, mapping any existing guarantee cover so the clause 11(ii) no-double-cover rule is not breached, checking how much of the ₹20 crore per-borrower capacity earlier lenders have already consumed, and pressing the Champion Sector classification where it applies — the difference between 2% and 1% AGF is a real cost the lender will price into the facility. On the MI or VDF side: the annual Management Certificate by 30 June, the 30 April fee renewal on which the cover's continuance depends, the statutory auditor certificate at each application and renewal, the quarterly portfolio reporting for umbrella cover, and the loss-asset certificate at claim stage. Clause 19(iii) gives the Trust an inspection right that reaches the borrower's own books — so the startup's file should be built to survive inspection, not merely to obtain sanction.